2 Comments

Even if the Wyoming Supreme Court unanimously answers all 14 question in the negative, don't expect the lying, murdering satanists to abandon their cause. Their demonic rage to murder has metastasized in their souls and these pro-murder-by-abortionists will not limit their rage to persons of the womb.

Expand full comment

INDEED: "Now the people of Wyoming wait to hear if the Supreme Court will hear their cries for the unborn."

Will our justices realize the objective truth, based in science of embryology, that the unborn child is a human life? Will they recognize sonogram pictures that make that plain to the casual observer, just a few weeks later in fetal development? They might note that even self-declared pro-abortion thought-leaders with intellectual honesty admit the humanity at its earliest stages; even so, such leaders subordinate an innocent human's right to life beneath the causes of female empowerment, sexual freedom, individual liberty/autonomy/privacy, or yet more bizarre philosophical extremes.

Will they consider the ruling of the US Supreme Court majority reasoned in Dobbs? That included:

"The Nation’s historical understanding of ordered liberty does not prevent the people’s elected representatives from deciding how abortion should be regulated." WY legislators' intent to regulate abortion is clear from the record, and everyone knows the intent of the health care amendment to the WY Constitution wasn't advertised as a way to enshrine abortion in our state.

Contrary to the pro-abortion assertion of a right to autonomy, the SCOTUS wrote: "Those criteria, at a high level of generality, could license fundamental rights to illicit drug use.... What sharply distinguishes the abortion right from the rights recognized in the cases on which Roe and Casey rely is something that both those decisions acknowledged: Abortion is different because it destroys what Roe termed “potential life” and what the law challenged in this case calls an “unborn human being.”"

Expand full comment